The Test Bench
I had been meaning to test the strength of a ball valve threaded directly onto a thru-hull, as many production builders do for seacock installations, but never actually got around to completing that task until now.
Many of the builders, who install seacocks in this manner, very often display the ABYC logo quite proudly suggesting their vessels are actually built to meet the minimum safety standards. In all fairness to the builders I suspect they actually believe these installations do or would meet the minimum safety standards but as I found out they certainly may not.
We can’t really blame the builders for installing UL Marine parts and then not having them meet the minimum standards, or can we? While a boat owner may assume the manufacturers would have tested these fittings for the application into which they are sold, they clearly have not.
As conducted the testing, to ABYC standards, it became apparent that a 3/4″ Marine UL bronze valve threaded to a 3/4″ Marine UL rated thru-hull fitting, does not meet ABYC H-27 Standards.
FAILURE = 404 Pounds
REQUIREMENT = 500 Pounds for 30 Seconds
This set up failed at just 404 pounds and I was an 1 3/8″ below the inboard end of the assembly so I had slightly less leverage than I would have had I been able to apply the load at the absolute inboard end of the assembly. The assembly includes all the hard piping usually ending with a male hose adapter or other bronze or Marelon fitting.
The bare minimum strength requirement, for installed seacocks under ABYC H-27, is to support a 500 pound static load for 30 seconds at the inboard end of the installed assembly.
Does this test mean a seacock like this will fail in normal use? Probably not but there is a higher probability than a seacock assembly that actually meets the ABYC standard. We had one fail on us when a spare alternator slid across a shelf and hit the in-board end of a seacock assembly, so it can/could potentially happen and has happened.. That event scared the living crap out of me and made me a firm believer in proper flanged seacocks.
When buying a boat with this type of installation please be aware of and know that it is, and can be, a potential week point that may not meet the minimum ABYC safety standards for seacocks and thru-hull fittings, at least in the 3/4″ size range.
EDIT: I later tested a 1″ thru-hull & ball valve combo and had it fail at below 500 pounds as well. It failed at 458 pounds.
The Safety Standards
ABYC H-27 Definitions:
27.4.4 Seacock – A type of valve used to control intake or discharge of water through the hull. It is operated by a lever type handle usually operating through a 90° arc, giving a clear indication of whether it is open or shut, and is typically of the two following types:
126.96.36.199 Flanged Sea Valve – A Seacock with an integral flange used to individually and securely mount the device directly to the boat hull structure.
188.8.131.52 In Line Ball Valve – A Seacock designed to be supported entirely by the through-hull fitting.
ABYC H-27 Key Points:
27.5.1 All piping, tubing, or hose lines penetrating the hull below the maximum heeled waterline, shall be equipped with a seacock to stop the admission of water in the event of failure of pipes, tubing, or hose.
27.5.4 Seacocks shall be designed and constructed to meet ANSI/UL 1121, Marine Through-Hull Fittings and Sea-Valves.
27.5.5 Thru-hull fittings shall be designed and constructed to meet ANSI/UL 1121, Marine Through-Hull Fittings and Sea-Valves.
27.6.1 A seacock shall be securely mounted so that the assembly will withstand a 500 pound (227 Kg) static force applied for 30 seconds to the inboard end of the assembly, without the assembly failing to stop the ingress of water.
184.108.40.206 The installation shall prevent any movement of the assembly.
220.127.116.11 Threads used in seacock installations shall be compatible (eg. NPT to NPT, NPS to NPS).
The materials for this test were all off the shelf UL Mairne products. I purchased everything from Hamilton Marine in Portland, ME.
To mimic what a boat owner, or boat yard may install, the components were a mix of what was on hand at the chandlery. The bronze UL Marine thru-hull fitting was made by Apollo/Conbraco, the UL Marine valve by Groco and the bronze elbow was also manufactured by Groco.
Where The Load Was Applied
The Inboard End
On the inboard end there was just 7/8″ of exposed thru-hull which, as I previously mentioned, mimics the installations I see on a daily basis. When I see a valve on a thru-hull I rarely if ever see them cut shorter. It would certainly help to make the assembly shorter but I just don’t see this done very often.
Even if I managed to get the valve within 1/8″ of the thru-hull nut, and then moved the load to the proper positioning for ABYC H-27, the thru-hull would have still failed at well below the standard of 500 pounds at the inboard end of the assembly for 30 seconds.
This Was a 2011 Production Sailboat
Cut It Shorter?
The Only Reason…
A Proper Installation in Bronze
Your below waterline seacocks are not a joke, not optional and are not a place to cut corners. Consider what is between you and the open ocean before plunking down 150K- 400K on a penny pinched vessel. Before taking deliver of a vessel, with a piss-poor seacock installation, do your best to negotiate proper seacocks into the deal. I would suggest refusing to take delivery until proper flanged bronze or Marelon OEM / 93 Series seacocks have been installed.